Ilven Taelur

A short introductory grammar

(Nimiauetuen talkertivon)
Introduction
Creating Languages
External History
Internal History
Google

Introduction

Tellic (Ilven Taelur, Ilven or simply Taelur) is the best known language of the Telluric language family. Tellic is a VSO language (though with a relatively free constituent order) displaying a combination of inflectional and agglutinative morphology. It is an ergative language - not in the traditional sense, where it is the subjects of transitive verbs that are marked for ergative case - but rather in the sense that it is the subjects of volitional verbs - those verbs where the subject has the control over the action - that are marked for ergative. As an example of this, consider the sentence paela kaunas tem (the woman looks at the house), where the volitional verb paelat (to look at) requires a subject kaunas marked for ergative and a direct object tem marked for nominative versus the sentence paeli kauna temsi (the woman sees the house) where the non-volitional verb paelit (to see) takes a subject kauna marked for nominative and a direct object temsi marked for ablative. For further details on this, please refer to the syntax section.
Most Tellic nouns and verbs are derived from CVC roots through different inflectional and derivational morphological mechanisms. Most adjectives are in fact expressed as non-volitional verbs.

In this web site you can find information on the following issues regarding the Tellic language:

Creating Languages

It is universally accepted that painting, dancing, singing, playing music, playing theatre, writing novels, essays and poetry, cooking and knitting, among other human activities, are forms of art. By art I understand any human activity - and its results - that, while not necessarily having any evident practical utility, causes pleasure in, at least, the maker and, hopefully, in a lesser or greater part of other human beings as well.
I would like to claim here that creating languages is another form of art, a lesser form of it, maybe, but art after all. In fact, it seems to comply with the above definition of art: it is a human activity, it is utterly useless and it certainly arises pleasure in myself. Whether the results of it arise such positive feelings in other persons remains questionable, but the fact that there are good known examples of language creations (e.g. Tolkien's constructed languages, Star Trek's Klingon, the fictional Romance language evolved from Latin called Brithenig, etc.), the huge number of constructed languages that have been published until now and a vast documentation on the issue (cf. Wikipedia's entry on Constructed Languages, also caled Conlangs) makes me thing that I'm not alone in this claim.

External History

To be written

Internal History

To be written

juan alberto alonso - 2007